For acquisitions of commercial items, post-award debriefings include which additional information?

• A. The warranty terms
• B. The make and model of the item to be delivered by the successful offeror
• C. The supplier's annual revenue
• D. The delivery schedule

Answer: (B)

When a procurement is for a commercial item, the post-award debriefing provides important specifics that help the unsuccessful offerors understand exactly what was awarded. The most relevant additional information in this context is identifying the exact item to be delivered—the make and model. This clarifies precisely which product the government intends to receive, which is especially important when many similar items exist in the market.

Why this makes sense: for commercial items, the contract isn’t just about generic capabilities; it’s about a specific product or configuration. Stating the make and model helps prevent confusion about what was actually awarded and supports a meaningful protest if a bidder believes the wrong item was considered.

The other options aren’t the added detail typically required in this setting. Warranty terms are contract terms and would come from the contract itself rather than from the debriefing’s standard additions. The supplier’s annual revenue is not relevant to the award decision or the debriefing. Delivery schedule may be discussed as part of performance, but the explicit “additional information” unique to commercial-item debriefings is the exact make and model of the item to be delivered.